RideMath ← All tools

CdA / Aero Time Saver

Most aero calculators tell you "this wheelset saves 8 watts." That's nearly useless until you see it as actual seconds on a 40 km TT. This calculator does that comparison across common setups — hoods, drops, aerobars, aero helmet, deep wheels — and adds the crosswind adjustment that a real wind usually demands.

SetupEffective CdASpeedTimevs Hoods

Effective CdA includes a crosswind penalty for deep-section wheels — the deeper the rim, the more sideways wind costs you. Numbers are conservative, based on published tour-magazine test data.

Why we show time saved, not watts

If someone tells you "this helmet saves 8 W at 30 km/h," the number is real but meaningless until you translate it. On a flat 40 km TT at 280 W, an 8 W saving is about 47 seconds. On a 90-minute hilly road race where you're drafting 80% of the time, it's basically nothing.

This calculator does the translation for you — at your course distance, your power, and your likely wind — and shows the time you'd save across five common setups.

What's in the comparison

What this calculator does differently

FAQ

Are these CdA numbers right for me?

Probably not exactly. Body position, clothing choice, frame design and skin-fitted vs loose jerseys all matter. The numbers here are typical mid-pack numbers from wind-tunnel tests. If you want your personal CdA, a velodrome field test or a CdA-testing service will get you within ±5%.

Why do deep wheels sometimes show slower time?

In a strong crosswind, deep rims can be slower than 40 mm wheels. We've modeled that — the bigger the crosswind, the more the deep-rim advantage shrinks. Above ~25 km/h crosswind at 80 mm depth, you're often better with shallower rims.

Is draft-effect included?

No. This is solo / TT only. On the road, you're usually in a group, and aero gear matters far less than getting into the right wheels.

Does this include rolling resistance?

No. A clean calculation of time saved by CdA change alone. If you're switching to deep wheels and they're slower to accelerate, that's a separate effect (rotational inertia) — small but non-zero on rolling courses.

About this tool

This calculator was built to answer a question most online versions skip or oversimplify. It runs entirely in your browser; no inputs are stored or transmitted. The math is grounded in standard cycling physics and physiology models, and is suitable for hobbyist and intermediate training use. It is not a substitute for a coach, sports scientist, or professional bike-fit service.

Privacy Policy

This tool does not collect personal data. All inputs and results stay in your browser. We do not set first-party analytics cookies. This site may display ads served by Google AdSense; Google, as a third-party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads based on a user's prior visits to this site or other sites. Google's use of advertising cookies enables it and its partners to serve ads based on the visit to this site and/or other sites on the Internet. You can opt out of personalized advertising by visiting Google Ads Settings (google.com/settings/ads). Third-party vendors, including Google, use cookies to serve ads based on a user's prior visits to this site or other sites.

Children under 13 are not the intended audience.

Disclaimer

This calculator is provided for general informational and educational purposes only. It is not medical, mechanical, or legal advice. Predicted values depend on inputs you supply and simplified physical models; real-world outcomes vary. Use at your own risk. Brand names are descriptive only and do not imply affiliation.